Friday, 16 February 2018

Live production: Mock VT Production



As my role within this unit is being a camera operator in both the VT & Live studio piece, i've been tasked to film a mock VT with a team of individuals to prepare ourselves with the right approach and skillset for the real thing. 

What?
As we had already thought of segments and the content for the VTs, we decided to shoot footage which would be close enough to the real thing, however obviously just a rough version that would be testing our abilities and giving us some clear perspective of certain areas of the VTs that we had doubts on. 

My VT team consisted of Callum, Drey & Amiee, each having their own individual role on the production of the VT. However on the day of the Mock up VT filming Alex was not available to film, so I used the camera in both groups VT mock up. 



Did you achieve what you set out to?
I believe with the short amount of time we had and having followed the script by the producer and ran through it cohesively with the director, it went relatively well. We got some okay-ish coverage, from a camera perspective, the white balance was challenging to get right due to a yellow light based in one of the rooms in which we were filming in. If setting out to do this mock up was to see the potential hazards for the real one, then we achieved that. 


Learning Outcome?
Things were definitely taken into account after creating this, as i'm still getting used to the camera (Panasonic DVX200) I know there's so much more features that can be accessed but just aren't due to negligence. I need to go further out of my way and speak to ferg to get a manual on them and keep reading, expanding my knowledge & capacity on the camera as if camera operating is a field i want to delve into then i have to engage with it consistently. 







Tuesday, 13 February 2018

Live production: Research into fashion trends



So I was tasked with being a researcher into the VT segment, Old to New. So I decided to focus my research on fashion trends that i followed and used to dislike with a passion, i found it easier researching something that i had a passion for regardless if it was positive or negative because i was interested nonetheless. 

Research -
We started a google drive and that's where everything was kept to be reviewed and potentially used for our VTs.

My Research into Fashion Trends -

Baggy clothing and it’s resurgence -




Revival of Reeboks/Nike Air Max, TNs Trainer, cultural appropriation? -
'Council House-Associated Vermin’

Nike TNs & Air Maxes were trainers generally associated with the lower working class teenagers of the 00s, which is when they first hit the shops.These trainers were fairly affordable, and rarely, if not never worn by someone not wearing nike tracksuit bottoms and a hoodie. However, for some strange reason, these creps are back now, and deemed ‘cool’ by the people who once saw them ‘scally’ trainers. The metamorphosis of these trainers is something that could be explored further.  
Reeboks

  • Reeboks had also been a thing of the past, as when they were around in the 90s and early 00s, they were no way near as commercially viable and prolific as today. Their branding has transformed, having big sponsorships and synergising with other giant brands/companies, i.e UFC, through that comes the global eye and through that you get attraction and appeal.
  • Reeboks were dubbed as the ‘ugly’ trainer in the 90s/00s in which lead to their inevitable death of the trainer brand around mid 00s.

Monday, 12 February 2018

Live production: Pointless - Entertainment programme research

The entertainment programme i've chosen as inspiration for my show & general interest in is, Pointless, BBC 1 programme screened at 17:15 every day on BBC 1.

(Pointless, BBC 1 Entertainment show)

The shows format is simple, two presenters and starting with 8 contestants, having 4 rounds, last round ending with the last remaining 2 contestants. It goes by round elimination, the contestants with the highest (most obvious) answer score, is eliminated. The most obscure answer, usually getting you the lowest points, tend to win, and if by the end of the last round you get a pointless answer, you win. 

I think this show really works well down to three things, the presenters, the simple format and also the engagement & shows concept that allows the audience at home to be so interactive. The presenters are what hold this show together, they bounce off one another and have humour which reflects in essence what the show is all about. 

This show is kind of similar to what i believe we were trying to achieve in steal in style in terms of the presenters, having them bounce off one another & have a seemingly solid bond. 

This show was also an inspiration for my first initial concept 'Out of Context', as its simple format would of worked really well with the music themed game. 

Tuesday, 6 February 2018

Live production: Camera workshop



With Del today we had a brilliant camera workshop in where we would all line up our cameras and practice our ability to shoot moving objects whilst we were also moving. 

Knowing that i'll be a camera operator in the actual live production, all of these workshops are pivotal in regards to learning & furthering my knowledge of how to use the cameras in a studio environment. 

OVERVIEW -
The exercise was focusing in on a coin, and we would have to try and find that focus 'biting' point, where it goes out of focus, and in. Then you just have to work out which way the focus ring goes. 
The exercise would then get more challenging by Del getting the volunteer that was holding the coin to start moving coin, and the camera operator therefore has to keep changing the focus ring to keep it in focus.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE/OUTCOMES - 
This gives such a vast real life application to anyone interested in wanting to become a camera operator in the future as its such great practice for shooting moving objects/people. 


Overall it was a very enjoyable experience with a lot of useful knowledge & insight to take away with me. 


Wednesday, 24 January 2018

Live production: Pitch & Proposal



The shows main themes and features it had from the original format had been kept, however with only a few tweaks regarding the running of the sequence, here is a script from the day of the pitch.

Jason and I have come up with a concept for an original educational game show, aimed at a peak time audience of both adults and children.

Here is our topline: “An adventure spanning through the ages in which contestants battle through challenges to escape the Time Trap”

We like to think of it as Doctor Who meets Horrible Histories meets Pointless, combining elements of time travel with fun historical facts, wrapped up in a competitive atmosphere.

The show will involve four average Joe’s competing against each other - they have not met before and should not come from a background in history or any historical studies.

The show is aimed at a peak time audience consisting of both children and adults, and would air around 5 and 7 PM.  We imagine this is the sort of thing that parents and children could watch together after work or school - tea time telly.

We’ve seen in the last few years, particularly since 2013 that general knowledge quiz shows airing around this time have been a success with audiences.  In particular, Pointless and The Chase have led the way with viewing figures and have both been nominated for and won NTAs for Best Daytime Programme in recent years.

We feel that the Time Trap will add a new and exciting twist to the quiz show by introducing the trope of time travel and most importantly, a more focused aim toward educating the audience.

So onto the details of the show itself:

We want to go for a science fiction / steampunk sort of aesthetic.  ‘Time’ and ‘history’ are the key themes of the show so we’d like a lot of clockwork and historical imagery in the set.

We feel two presenters would work well for the show’s format.  It is important to note that they will be playing characters as well as presenting the show itself and that their portrayal of the role works in play to drive the show forward.

We have the nameless ‘Time Traveller’ - an eccentric and swashbuckling genius, sort of like a cocky Doctor Who.  In the presentation this character is male, but could easily work for a female as well. He or she is joined by Larry - the Time Traveller’s long-suffering assistant.  I feel he should be the Igor to Dr Frankenstein, but also be the loveable idiot - like Baldrick. I picked out this clip which I feel illustrates the sort of dynamic between the two that I would like to see.

The show itself will consist of four rounds which we’ll go into a bit more detail shortly but in the meantime, we’ve worked out a rough running order for how the show will fit together.

HAND OUT RUNNING ORDER

We have a rough layout of how we envisage the set layout to look: we have the seating area by the hydraulic door… We want to put a screen here through a “window” in the set to look like the Time Traveller’s “computer”.

We also have a green screen backstage, which will be used when contestants are eliminated.  They will stand in front of the green screen as a looped clip of a particular time period is played in the background - creating the impression that they have been trapped in time.

Onto the first round: “Who Said It?”.  In this round, a sound clip of a quote from a famous historical figure will be played aloud to the studio - the first contestant to buzz in and answer correctly is through to the next round.  Another quote is played for the remaining three contestants, and again until there is only one contestant left that has not answered a question.

Now we have a few quotes to test your knowledge and to get a better grasp at what the round is about:

1 - “History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.” KARL MARX, author of the Communist Manifesto and architect of Marxism
2 - “Trust in God - She will provide.“ EMMELINE PANKHURST, leader of the Suffragette movement
3 - “An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” MAHATMA GANDHI, activist and leader of the Indian independence movement

This round will also end with a short sketch involving the three figures and our presenters getting up to some mishaps to add to the entertaining element of the show.

Round 2 will involve our contestants watching a clip of our presenters living in another time period - this draws on experiential shows such as The Victorian Slum which took ordinary people and put them in the lives of people living during the 19th century.  Our clip will last around 2 to 3 minutes and we will see the Time Traveller and Larry living the lives of ordinary people in the given time period - the contestants will then have two minutes to answer questions about the time period and the clip, the contestant with the fewest points is eliminated.

Afterwards we have round 3: Artefact Analysis.  The two remaining contestants are each showed two different historical artefacts.  We see a VT clip of the first object with hints to facts about the object, such as what it was used for - they must guess where the object is from and when it was found, made or invented.  The second contestant does the same with another VT clip, and whoever answers closest to the real answer wins the round and is through to the final.

Just to help demonstrate the concept, I’ve brought along an object for you to guess where its from and what year it’s from:

I’ll give you a few clues: this belonged to my great great grandfather, John Reade.  He was a stretcher bearer for the army and its place of origin is often referred to as ‘the forgotten front’

It was found in Thessaloniki, now known as Silonika, Greece in which the Allied Forces entered the region to fight back against German and Bulgarian forces after the collapse of Serbia in 1915 - World War 1.

We feel that this round, as well as being educational would work as a nice segment to bring about small fun little anecdotes such as this in which my great great grandad found a horse hoof in the war.

The university has contacts in the Rochester Guildhall Museum so there is potential to ask for objects from there, but I had this in my house - history is everywhere and I feel we could achieve the same thing with objects from crew members, from antique shops; practically anywhere, and we don’t necessarily need to rely on external contributors for obtaining these artefacts.

The final round is a simple 90 second quickfire answer round based on the time periods covered previously in the show.  They must answer 10 questions correctly in order to win the trophy - the Time Core - the power source for the Time Traveller’s time machine.  If they fail they may walk free, but without the Time Core trophy.

So that’s the show and a just to clarify a few things to consider in terms of logistics:

We will need to find locations to shoot the VTs depending on which time period we are shooting.  We would also need to hire actors to work alongside our main cast.  Props and costumes are something we would also need to consider, and as I said previously the objects can be obtained through a number of routes - through museums and historical societies or from people’s homes and antique shops.

Thank you for taking the time to listen to our pitch - we feel that Time Trap stands out for being both educational and entertaining with an appeal to all ages.  We want to use aspects of experiential formats combined with the competitive nature of a quiz show to add tension and life to fun and learning. Any questions are welcome.

I was super impressed with how myself and Alex composed ourselves for this pitch, we went in with the right mindset and approach and i feel it paid dividends, possibly not enough to get us first position, however we did get runners up. Obviously we knew that with this concept being a game show, we were already at a disadvantage due to previous years creating the latter, however it was an idea we both felt really worked and was definitely achievable in the realms of a studio based show.



Tuesday, 23 January 2018

Live Production: Unit briefing and initial concepts


So we were briefed on our new unit production which entailed a list of things for us to do.
Our main task was to come up with a concept that could be screened 'As live', so any TV show format in the realms of being realistically achievable, i.e chat shows, fashion programmes, game show etc. 

We were put into pairs to work on our concepts together, I was put with Alex and we both decided to come up with our own idea initially, and then see which one would work best.

Alex came up with his concept called 'Time Trapped', which was a historical game show with 2 presenters, mine was called 'Out of Context', a musical themed game show with 1 presenter. 

We spoke with Helen briefly about our initial concepts and she knew that we needed to research more and find a better angle for both 



Wednesday, 17 January 2018

Live production: Development of concept



Having had a discussion with Helen regarding both of mine and Alex's concepts, we decided collectively it was probably best to drop my idea and continue further development on Alex's as his had a more cohesive, stronger structure & concept. 

(Alex's initial concept)

So having two minds focusing on one concept benefited quite relatively, we added a feature of a segment of my show, onto Alex's, which was a lyric from a famous musician/song, and contextualised it into something that would fit the tone of the show, that being a famous sentence of a historical figure. 

We still knew there was much more development to happen and we just needed to narrow down what the segments would include & what the VTs would be, but it was slowly coming together before the pitch.